Values of EBEI
are empirically determined using a numerical scheme. Their results indicate that runup is directly dependent on wave height, which is consistent with previous studies. To conclude this section, a detailed review of current runup models shows that existing runup equations are based either on analytical and numerical studies, or Ixazomib supplier on few sources of experiments, which mainly involved solitary waves and bores. Most runup equations are either empirical or based on energy dissipation but do not account for the wavelength or wave shape. There is common agreement that wave amplitude needs to be considered in the prediction of runup. The influence of beach slope has been taken into account in most runup equations, with steeper slopes predicting a higher runup for breaking waves, the opposite trend being observed for non-breaking waves. Runup as a function of the energy dissipated SB431542 mw by the wave during breaking has been investigated; however, breaking processes are complex, and the dissipated energy varies with bed slope and wave profile. The influence of wavelength or wave packet length is rarely considered. While potential and kinetic energy are used as the
basis of a number of approximate models, they are not assessed in the context of the wave form. Lastly, there are conflicting conclusions when runup is considered solely as a function of amplitude, especially when waveform is analysed. As Klettner et al. (2012) demonstrated, runup depends critically on the shape of the wave with leading elevated waves running up further than leading depressed. Therefore, it is important to know the contribution of wave shape to runup characteristics. In the following analysis the parameters to be considered
are H,a,a-,L,h,β,EP,ρH,a,a-,L,h,β,EP,ρ and g . a corresponds to the positive amplitude of any wave, a-a- corresponds to the negative amplitude RANTES of an N-wave; and |a|+|a-|=Ha+a-=H (for an elevated wave, a=Ha=H). EPEP is the total potential energy of a given wave. For N-waves, this can be split into the potential energy of the trough, EP-, and the potential energy of the peak, EP+ (for elevated waves, EP+=EP). ρρ is the water density, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The wave generator used in this study is described in Rossetto et al. (2011). The novel element of the generator is that it generates waves pneumatically by raising and lowering the water free-surface within an enclosed tank, placed at one end of the wave flume. This mechanism allows the generation of stable leading depressed waves. The tests were carried out at HR Wallingford, where the generator was placed at one end of a 45 m long and 1.2 m wide flume. At the other end of the flume a bathymetry was built with a sump next to the end wall. The sump prevented reflections from the highest waves reaching the end of the flume.